Air Arabia: What’s it like to fly low-cost from Prague to Bangkok?
A return flight from Prague to Bangkok 432 eur looked great. However, there were a few snags. No checked-in luggage, no meals and, most importantly, two flights of about six hours each on an Airbus A320.
Special offers with Air Arabia pop up frequently. As well as Thailand, they often have good prices to Malaysia, Sri Lanka, the Maldives or Nepal.
So I wanted to find out for myself whether a long-haul journey with a low-cost airline is really such an ordeal, or whether we’re just needlessly fretting, mainly because of the words ‘small Airbus A320’.
Would I fly with Air Arabia again? Yes.
But not at any price. You’ll find the specific threshold at which Air Arabia makes sense to me at the end of this review.
My trip in a nutshell
| My journey | |
|---|---|
| Route | Prague – Sharjah – Bangkok |
| Return ticket price | 432 eur |
| Price including two meals | approx. 452 eur |
| Checked-in luggage | No |
| Aircraft | Airbus A320 on both flights |
| Flight duration | 6 hours + 6.5 hours |
| Connection in Sharjah | 2.5 hours |
| In-flight internet | No |
| In-flight entertainment | Free via on-board Wi-Fi |
| Charging | No sockets or USB ports |
Right at the start, one important confession. Both flights were half-empty and each time I had the whole row of three seats to myself.
That made my experience much better. On a completely full flight, I’d probably rate the comfort more harshly. Perhaps. Although, in the end, the legroom remains the same either way.
How much did the ticket actually cost me?
I bought the ticket directly from airarabia.com. The base fare 432 eur included hand luggage, but not checked-in luggage or meals.
I didn’t need a hold-bag. However, on the flight from Prague to Sharjah, I pre-ordered a baguette, and on the longer leg to Bangkok, a hot meal. In total, the return flight cost me about 452 eur.
When comparing prices, therefore, don’t just look at the first price shown on a search engine. Add in the cost of checked-in luggage with Air Arabia, meals and any seat selection fees. Only then does it make sense to compare Air Arabia with Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways or Emirates.
Compare flight prices to Bangkok
Prague–Sharjah flight: a classic low-cost option
The night flight departed from Prague at 9.30 pm. I arrived at check-in two hours early.
There was absolutely no one ahead of me. The whole check-in process with Air Arabia took exactly one minute.
I waited until departure in the Erste Premier lounge, which I gained access to via Revolut.
Then I made my way to one of the rear rows of the Airbus A320.
The interior feels pleasant. It’s certainly better than on standard European low-cost carriers such as Ryanair or Wizz Air.
I’m sitting in row 23, where the seat pitch is 71 cm – exactly the same as on Ryanair, for example. And 7 cm less than on Qatar Airways or Etihad Airways, for instance.
The flight was half-empty and the whole row of three seats next to me remained free. On a night flight, that’s obviously almost like winning the lottery.
About 45 minutes after take-off, the pre-ordered snack arrived. The baguette was absolutely dreadful. Not just average, nor even ‘good for a flight’. Just dreadful. :)
I was also given a small bottle of water. That’s definitely not enough for six hours, so after going through security, buy or fill up your own larger bottle. Or order the standard meal, which – spoiler alert from the second flight – was, in fact, very good.
Food and drink can also be purchased during the flight. Pre-ordering gives you a wider choice, and the crew hand these out first.
But after the meal, it’s time to say goodnight!
Otherwise, the whole flight went without a single hitch. Both the departure and arrival were on time, and thanks to the empty row of three seats, I managed to sleep through most of the journey.
We land in Sharjah whilst it is still pitch dark, just before 5 o’clock in the morning local time.
The views of the cities at night are brilliant, though. That’s one of the reasons why I always choose a window seat:
Changing planes in Sharjah: the shorter the layover, the better
I had 2½ hours for the transfer. Sharjah Airport is old, small and very basic.
You have to go through security when transferring. In my case, everything went very smoothly and the actual walk between the gates took only about 5 to 15 minutes.
If both flights are on the same ticket, I wouldn’t be put off even by the shortest connection that Air Arabia offers.
The airport has a single terminal and the signage is clear. We describe the detailed procedure in our guide to transferring at Sharjah Airport.
In my opinion, Sharjah is the easiest transfer airport in the Middle East that I’ve flown through so far. I’d much rather transfer here than at the huge airport in Dubai.
Paradoxically, the downside is the longer layover. There aren’t many places to sit in the terminal. There’s quite a wide selection of restaurants and several duty-free shops, but I wouldn’t want to spend several hours here.
I headed to The Lounge. I gained access via Revolut Ultra and was pleasantly surprised by it, given it’s a low-cost airport. The lounge is spacious and offers plenty of hot and cold food. The only thing missing is a shower.
It’s significantly more pleasant than the publicly accessible lounge in Abu Dhabi, but at the same time considerably worse than Al Maha in Doha.
I describe how I use lounge access and when the expensive plan pays off in the article ‘Revolut Ultra and airport lounges’.
Sharjah–Bangkok flight: seat 6A and, at last, a decent meal
The second flight took off at around 7.30 am and landed in Bangkok at around 5.45 pm.
Boarding was quick and very orderly via the jet bridge.
Once again, I was lucky to find a half-empty plane and a free row of three seats.
This time I tried the front seat, 6A, which has a seat pitch of 32 inches, or about 81 cm. Compared to the standard rows, the difference is really noticeable.
Incidentally, the very first row always has the most legroom, so if you’re tall, consider paying extra for these seats:
The meal arrived again about 45 minutes after take-off. After my experience with the baguette, I wasn’t expecting much, but the chicken biryani was the exact opposite. A generous portion and a really tasty meal.
Once again, I was only given a small bottle of water. In Sharjah, however, I passed through security between the central hall and the gates without any problems, even with a bottle of water holding more than a litre. Take this as my experience on a specific flight, not as a guarantee for every day and every security check.
On arrival at Suvarnabhumi, I got through passport control quickly this time (the queue was about 15 minutes long) and then set off on the free shuttle bus to Don Muang Airport. But more on that another time...
I describe the various options, prices and my recommended choice in the guide to transport from Bangkok BKK Airport.
Is an Airbus A320 a problem for a six-hour flight?
Both my flights were operated by an Airbus A320. Air Arabia also has extended-range A321s in its fleet, but it still only uses narrow-body aircraft from the Airbus A320 family.
No Boeing 787s, Airbus A350s or other conventional long-haul wide-body aircraft.
And honestly: so what?
Each of the two flights takes around six hours. During that time, I go for a walk at most once. One aisle instead of two is no problem for me.
What’s more, when I’m travelling on my own, I always choose a window seat. I like looking out, and it gives me something to rest my head on when I’m sleeping. On an A320, I have to step over two passengers to get to the aisle. But it’s exactly the same on most long-haul aircraft with a 3–3–3 or 3–4–3 seating layout. There’s no difference whatsoever.
Exceptions include, for example, the Airbus A330 or the Boeing 767, which have two window seats.
Less legroom, but a surprisingly wide seat
The standard row pitch on my A320 was just 28 inches, or 71 cm. That’s the same as on Ryanair or Wizz Air. Taller passengers will notice the difference.
It’s worth emphasising that my positive rating is also because I’m only 175 cm tall, so the lack of legroom isn’t a major issue for me.
On the other hand , the seat width is 18 inches, or about 46 cm. That’s roughly 2.5 cm wider than the seats on some of the long-haul Boeing 787s operated by Qatar Airways or Etihad Airways.
A narrow-body aircraft does not, therefore, automatically mean a narrower seat. Knee room is somewhat limited, but shoulder room is, on the other hand, very decent.
The seat reclines by about 3 inches, or 7.6 cm. This is less than in standard long-haul economy class, but still better than the fixed backrests found on some European low-cost carriers.
A big plus is the adjustable headrest, which helps me sleep more than a few extra centimetres of recline ever could.
The 174-seat Airbus A320 has only three toilets. That works out at one for every 58 passengers, and queues can form on a full flight. On my half-empty flights, however, I didn’t have to wait even once.
The in-flight entertainment system works well. There’s no way to charge your devices at all
There are no screens in the seats. After take-off, however, you can connect to the in-flight Wi-Fi using your phone, tablet or laptop and access the free SkyTime service.
It features films, TV series, music and other basic content. The selection is significantly smaller than that offered by Qatar Airways or Etihad Airways, but it’ll keep you entertained for a few hours. It worked flawlessly for me.
Please note that this Wi-Fi is not intended for connecting to the internet.
The biggest real drawback for me was charging. On neither flight was there a power socket, USB port or wireless charger. Yet watching films on your own device drains the battery quickly.
So make sure you charge your phone fully before the flight. Power banks are not permitted on Air Arabia flights.
Download your own films or TV series in advance. SkyTime may be enough, but it’s not worth relying on it alone.
Don’t expect to find a pillow or blanket on your seat. For a night-time flight, I’d take my own travel pillow and a warmer jumper.
Air Arabia vs. Qatar Airways and Etihad Airways
Air Arabia isn’t a full-service long-haul airline offering lower fares. It’s a low-cost carrier and should be judged as such.
Compared to Qatar Airways or Etihad Airways, what I found lacking most was:
- meals and a wider selection of drinks included in the fare
- a screen with a significantly wider range of films
- a power socket or USB port
- a pillow and a blanket
- more legroom in standard seating
- the option to earn miles with partner airlines
Air Arabia has its own AirRewards programme, but points cannot be transferred to another airline’s programme.
With Qatar Airways or Etihad Airways, I have more options for where to transfer my miles. RevPoints can also be transferred to both programmes.
On the other hand, I didn’t mind having just one aisle, and the seat was actually more comfortable in terms of width than on some long-haul aircraft.
For a direct comparison, please also read our review of Qatar Airways Economy on the Prague–Doha–Bangkok route and our review of Etihad Airways on the Bangkok–Abu Dhabi–Prague route.
When would I choose Air Arabia again?
I would choose Air Arabia if:
- it is at least 82 eur to 123 eur cheaper than acceptable competitors, after factoring in meals, luggage and a seat
- it offers significantly better travel dates
- it has a short stopover in Sharjah
- the only alternative is an inconvenient stopover in Dubai
Conversely, I would not choose it if:
- the difference compared to Qatar Airways or Etihad Airways is only around 41 eur
- I need a checked-in bag, two meals and a paid seat, which would cancel out the price difference
- I need to work online or charge my laptop during the flight
- I am tall and there is no seat available with extra legroom
Overall rating: I’d happily fly with them again, but I’m not tall...
I’m 175 cm tall, so the slightly less legroom didn’t really bother me.
The seat was quite wide, the adjustable headrest was comfortable, and I managed the two flights of around six hours each, with an easy connection in Sharjah, with no trouble at all.
The biggest drawback wasn’t the Airbus A320 or the single aisle. It was the lack of any charging facilities.
Taller passengers will also be much more aware of the seat pitch of just 71 cm.
I’d like to point out once again that I had a whole row of three seats to myself on both flights. You can’t expect that every time.
For the return journey to Bangkok, 452 eur , Air Arabia makes a lot of sense.
It isn’t as good as Qatar Airways or Etihad Airways. Nor does it need to be, provided it’s a few thousand cheaper or offers a better travel date.
I’d therefore buy the same ticket again. Just not that baguette, though.
Where to go next when planning your trip
Any questions left?
If you have any questions or comments about the article...
7 comments
Many thanks for a really comprehensive and detailed review. Yesterday I also bought a PRG-BKK ticket with them (for 12,700 for a February ‘Value’ fare, including checked-in luggage and a meal), so today I’m looking into exactly what I’ve bought. Lately, I’ve been flying with Qatar twice a year, at a price of around 16; this time, 14 days ago, I saw a Qatar offer for almost the same price as AirArabia’s, but with a departure from Prague at 9 am, so that wasn’t an option for me. Basically, apart from the price, it’s important to me that departures and arrivals are at reasonable times, which is the case with AirArabia. With other airlines, flights at reasonable times cost 17t+, which is a noticeable difference.
Looking at the reviews, I’m 175 cm tall too, so I should be fine; it’s a relatively direct flight and six hours is manageable (the direct flight to Seoul last time wasn’t great, even in a more luxurious aircraft), I’m not interested in the food after having been in the lounges, and I’ve never used the charger. So hopefully it won’t be a dreadful experience. If it is, next time it’ll be Emirates, Etihad or Qatar only; Turkish is out of the question, because you buy a decent ticket from them and they change it to absolute rubbish a few weeks before departure.
That’s exactly how I feel – I don’t get up before ten either.
You’re right, the Turks are a bunch of bastards; they’ve messed up my flight times a few times too, but I had no choice but to go along with it. I don’t fly with those Arabs from Sharjah anymore; they’re always getting on my nerves with that ‘Allah Akbar’ over the PA three times to make sure the plane doesn’t crash into the ground by accident, and it stinks in there like a girls’ changing room after PE.
I’d also keep an eye out to see if they’re taking on any radical staff like FlyDubai 😁
My first flight with Air Arabia – I’m 197 cm tall – and I was given a seat in the back rows with 71 cm of legroom, which was absolute torture (Kryštof is a bit mistaken; Ryanair has 76 cm of legroom). I pleaded with the flight attendant to see if there was a free seat elsewhere. Unfortunately, the flight was full. On subsequent flights, I paid extra for seats at the front.
Charging is possible on their A321neo, for example on the route to Kuala Lumpur.
As for compensation, for example, the agency has already filed a lawsuit against them in an Austrian court. I’m curious to see how it turns out; it’s been dragging on for a year now. We missed our connection in Sharjah – due to insufficient handling capacity at Vienna Airport.
I recommend not buying the Basic fare, which doesn’t include any services; always go for Value. I only made an exception for my last ticket, where I used miles accumulated in their AirRewards programme to upgrade my seat and purchase a meal.
As has already been said, you should only buy tickets with them if there’s a significant price difference compared to standard airlines, or in cases where you need to fly to some remote corner of India with a single stopover.
I do think it’s a shame that those seats (the 3-seat rows in this case) aren’t easy to adjust. For a start, it would prevent you from falling out whilst sleeping in an empty 3-seat row, and it would probably be more comfortable to sleep there without that gap for your legs; also, when the flight isn’t full, the airlines could use this to increase the space between seats, they’d simply leave some rows unoccupied and, by moving the seats, turn economy into something almost like business class for economy passengers :-) Well, but then they’d have to seat people in those rows again and you wouldn’t be able to lie down :-) Except on very empty flights, that is.... This one certainly looked very empty.
The first row does have more legroom, but unless you’re lucky enough to get a free seat in the third row, or at least a free middle seat, you won’t be able to enjoy it properly because of those partitions with tables between the seats...
I’m curious too. We’re flying to HKT at Christmas and I’ve paid extra for Exit, so hopefully it’ll all work out.
In the video, I can see that the armrests in the emergency row are the same as those on the other seats (not the fixed ones like in the first row), so perhaps they can be raised. But I can’t confirm this, as I’ve never sat in an exit row myself.
There are three of us flying, so hopefully it’ll be OK.
As for flying long-haul on a low-cost carrier, why not? I myself flew to BKK recently with Salam Air, but that was for just under 7k RT. For 11k, it just doesn’t make sense to me. For that price, you could fly with a full-service airline as part of one of their many special offers. Of course, this is in light of the current situation in the Gulf and airfares.
You can just about manage it with a whole empty three-seater row – that’s 200 per cent better than elsewhere – but otherwise I wouldn’t fly that far in it, not in a million years. We now deliberately choose long-haul flights where there are twin seats available, and we’re happy to pay for them (I don’t mean the ones by the emergency exit next to the loo in the middle of the plane with no window, where everyone’s standing around) – I call it ‘Premium Economy for the poor’ 😃
Well, it’s always 200 per cent different elsewhere :) but for me, as an average-sized solo traveller, an A320 in one of the front rows is definitely better than a 787/350 anywhere. I simply prefer those few centimetres of extra width.
Otherwise, of course, those seats are the best – I agree. But they’re as rare as hen’s teeth.
It’s true that those twin seats are as rare as hen’s teeth :/ Almost all the planes flying around are 787s or A350s, or possibly A380s, and they usually don’t have them… the good old A330 🙂
Exactly, the A330 is definitely my favourite long-haul aeroplane. I was just about to say that I’m looking forward to my trip with VietJetAir, but then I realised... :D
The A330’s my favourite too… but with VietJet, have fun 🙈🙈🙈 haha
A very nice review and, in my opinion, an accurate one; I flew with them from Kraków to Sri Lanka for 6,700 CZK (promotional first flights). The first stopover was in Sharjah for just 1 hour 20 minutes; on the return journey, it was perhaps only 45 minutes. We made both connections without any problems. We were also very lucky: on the flight from Kraków at half past midnight, I got a row of three empty seats and slept the whole way, before continuing on to Colombo, where the plane was already full. The return journey was even better – both legs were on an empty plane – and I arrived in Kraków in the morning having had a decent night’s sleep; I only woke up an hour before we landed in Kraków, just as the sun was coming up. As far as I can remember, the prices for food and water were very reasonable: 6 AED for water and we had a Caesar salad on board for 15 AED. In about two months’ time, they’ll start flying from Katowice as well, so we’ll see what the pricing is like, but nothing has really caught my eye yet and I haven’t booked anything.
First flights from 17 December 2026.
Four times a week: Monday, Thursday, Friday and Saturday.
Szarża–Katowice 08:00–11:20 local time
(Mondays and Fridays) Katowice–Szardża 12.10–20.55
(Mondays and Fridays) Szardża–Katowice 17:55–21:15
(Thursday and Saturday) Katowice–Sargża 22.05–6.50 (Thursday and Saturday)